Liquidium vs Aave
Comparison
Liquidium vs. Compound
Comparison two DeFi lending protocols: Liquidium’s Bitcoin-focused cross-chain lending and Compound’s Ethereum-based lending markets.Focus: native Bitcoin collateral and cross-chain borrowing vs Ethereum-centric markets.
Liquidium
- True cross-chain lending protocol
- Native Bitcoin support (no centralized wrapping)
- Supply on one chain, borrow on another
- No centralized bridges required
Compound
- DeFi lending pioneer (since 2018)
- Invented cToken interest-bearing model
- COMP governance token distributions
- Multiple EVM-chain deployments
Feature Comparison
| Feature | Liquidium | Compound |
|---|---|---|
True Cross-Chain Lending Compound has separate deployments per chain | ||
Native Bitcoin Support Compound uses wrapped Bitcoin only | ||
No Bridging Required Liquidium avoids centralized bridges | ||
Non-Custodial Both protocols are non-custodial | ||
Over-Collateralized Loans Industry standard for DeFi lending | ||
Algorithmic Interest Rates Both use supply/demand-based rates | ||
cToken/Share Model Both use share-based accounting | ||
Governance Token LIQ and COMP token for protocol governance |
Key Differences
Cross-Chain vs. Multi-Chain
Liquidium
is natively cross-chain. Your collateral on Bitcoin can back a loan on Ethereum without centralized bridges. One unified lending position across all chains.
Compound
deploys separate instances on each chain (Ethereum, Arbitrum, Base, etc.). Assets on one chain cannot be used as collateral for loans on another.
Bitcoin Integration
Liquidium
enables native Bitcoin lending on Bitcoin Layer-1. No centralized wrapping, no third-party custodians holding your Bitcoin.
Compound
only supports wrapped Bitcoin (WBTC) which requires trusting a centralized custodian. Native Bitcoin is not supported.
Protocol History
Liquidium
builds on these foundations while adding true cross-chain functionality that wasn't possible when Compound was created.
Compound
pioneered algorithmic lending in 2018 and invented the cToken model for interest-bearing deposits. It's one of the most influential DeFi protocols.
Governance
Liquidium
focuses on protocol development and cross-chain infrastructure first, with governance features to follow.
Compound
has a mature governance system with COMP token holders voting on protocol changes. It pioneered liquidity mining in DeFi.
When to Choose Each Protocol
Choose Liquidium If You:
- Want to use native Bitcoin as collateral
- Need cross-chain borrowing capabilities
- Prefer avoiding centralized bridges and wrapping
- Want unified capital across multiple chains
Choose Compound If You:
- Prefer a battle-tested protocol from 2018
- Want to earn COMP governance tokens
- Only operate within Ethereum or one EVM chain
- Value the cToken composability ecosystem
Ready to Try Cross-Chain Lending?
Experience the future of DeFi with true cross-chain lending on Liquidium.
Other Comparisons
